While
there’s a certain warm fuzzy to the “consumerization of IT,” it’s a fact that
industrial-strength infrastructure can’t be had on the cheap, assembled,
Lego-like, from a grabbag of components snagged from the local RadioShack. Yet that’s precisely the State of Virtualization
2013.
This
breed of virtualization has rapidly fed a cottage industry, doing a disservice
to organizations that deserve a real alternative to pricey, often ungainly,
enterprise solutions. Yet there is a
middle ground. Businesses need to look for the highest functioning environment
that fits their budget. Anything else
will cost more – perhaps much more – in the long run.
File this under “there’s no such thing as a
free lunch.” Businesses simply cannot scrimp on security, support, basic
hardware and the like. It’s not possible
to buy a firewall at Fry’s and call it “security,” or install Hyper-V on a
consumer PC and call it “virtualization.”
Building a Virtual Dedicated Server hosting environment requires
collaboration among professionals from every discipline. What matters is the quality of the total
package – the equipment, the software, the support, the intangibles that, in
the end, define the solution -- not the marketing involved in selling something
that truly can’t deliver.
In the cloud, as on the ground, it’s caveat
emptor. Businesses need to know that
virtualization/cloud hosting isn’t a commodity business, and that some vendors
do emulate the so-called big players in the quality of the environments they
build and the kind of support they provide.
It’s entirely possible to provide high function at modest cost, but
doing so requires expertise, experience and a genuine understanding of what
businesses need. Qualitatively, the
differences between these carefully crafted environments and the majors is
marginal. This fusion of quality and
value is actually something of a breakthrough, but taking advantage of it does
require that businesses be discerning about their options.
Another
recent survey revealed that, three to one, IT decision makers prefer cloud
providers who deliver solid customer service and tech support – even if those
providers charge more.
Of course, you can’t really put a
price on downtime. Or as Dirty Harry
observed in a somewhat different context, “you’ve got to ask yourself one
question – do I feel lucky?”
Hi
ReplyDeleteGood post, indeed virtualization can be expensive. The way I see it, it can cause exorbitant amount of problem, if you consider opportunity cost "what if" situations for businesses.
Also, few months ago Forrester did a good research on the true cost of cloud computing using the Relative Cost of Operations method, it worth reading!