- John Fruehe, vice president of outbound Marketing
at NextIO, says:
Virtualization
has had a dramatic impact on the manageability and efficiency of IT environments
over the last decade. CIOs were able to greatly reduce both capital and
operating expenditures by virtualizing, driving down the cost of IT and helping
businesses grow while keeping IT costs in check. However, as companies became
addicted to the TCO savings of virtualization and virtualized more of the IT
environment, it became harder to wring out more savings from additional
projects. CEOs and CFOs grew to expect similar savings as IT expanded, but when
the majority of servers are already virtualized, “doing more with less” becomes
more of a challenge.
We’ve
seen key components of the server – the CPU, the memory, and the storage –
being virtualized, giving customers more flexibility and more agility than
ever. The problem is that the I/O devices – network controllers and storage
controllers – are still tied to the physical platform, creating the final
bottleneck in the system. While server CPU and memory tends to cycle about
every 18-24 months, I/O typically lags and is on a different cadence, leading
to unbalanced systems.
As
customers face the challenge of driving better I/O, they look to technologies
like 10GbE down to the server or converged infrastructures which bring the
promise of higher bandwidth but typically come with a very steep price tag.
Blade growth has flattened out as well; those that believe blades are the
answer have staked their claim in the market, but the rest of the world is
grappling with how to increase I/O bandwidth without breaking the budgets. Many
servers in the data center need more bandwidth but not all of them do. Buying
into these solutions brings more bandwidth to all the servers in the rack at a
high cost, regardless of whether or not they need it.
By
virtualizing I/O, individual servers can access a shared pool of I/O resources
that can be dynamically added and re-allocated across the rack depending on
workload demands, putting the bandwidth where it is needed without taxing those
that don’t need more bandwidth. Taking this final virtualization step will
enable the other server components to operate more efficiently with more
flexibility, and ultimately save companies money. It’s time to explore the last
frontier.
Replacing
the current top of rack solutions with I/O consolidation appliances such as
NextIO’s vNET I/O Maestro allows businesses to get all of the benefits of
blades, 10GbE infrastructure and even converged infrastructures. However, these solutions do not break your
budget or lock you into a proprietary technology – truly the best of both
worlds – all of the benefits with none of the downside.
Author bio: John
Fruehe has been in the enterprise market for more than 20 years and is the Vice
President of Outbound Marketing at NextIO. He is responsible for helping the company roll out its marketing
strategy for the vNET I/O Maestro, which helps companies affordably pool, share
and manage I/O. You can contact the
author at jfruehe@nextio.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment