- Jonathan Crane, Chief Commercial
Officer, IPsoft, says:
Cloud
architecture utilization has come to demand an unmanageable speed of
responsiveness and high agility, putting tremendous pressure on the management
of the infrastructure environment. And while cloud management processes have slowly
improved, one glaring problem still plagues cloud performance: human error.
Mistakes
are inevitable when people handle important cloud and IT processes, but the
rate of human error appears to be rising beyond an acceptable rate. For example,
the recent Blackberry
server outage and a number of other cloud outages were instigated by human
error. These examples demonstrate just how devastating mistakes can be, resulting
in poor end-user experiences, revenue loss and damage to a company’s reputation.
The
problem is that the current mindset in cloud management seems to be one of
retroactive fire drills rather than proactive prevention. Instead of reacting
to the disastrous results of human error, IT departments should be pushing for
the minimization, if not complete elimination, of cloud issues resulting from human
error.
Many
companies are implementing automation to help manage basic cloud management and
IT functions. These tools come in two flavors: traditional automation, which relies
on a tree-based logic system, and autonomic expert systems, which are based on
self-learning principles. Traditional automation follows a pre-programmed
formula based on set conditions and works well when the same process is
repeated often.
Autonomic expert systems also help eradicate human
error, as these tools can track and mimic the work of human engineers to eliminate
human involvement in up to 70 percent of level 1 IT tasks and 30-40 percent of level
2 IT tasks. That’s the equivalent of about four days of work each week. Employing
expert systems leads to reduced IT costs and improved scalability, flexibility
and compliance in an enterprise’s cloud environment. Because autonomics can
perform routine IT processes much more reliably and efficiently than humans,
implementing autonomics often means drastic reductions in latency and mean time
to resolution (MTTR) for downtime. Autonomics also result in more consistent
business-related outcomes and allow engineers to focus on more creative
pursuits instead of mundane, repetitive tasks.
Without
the shift to expert systems, human error will continue to impede cloud and IT performance.
Already, companies that implement autonomic expert systems are removing humans
from 40 and up to 80 percent of IT operational tasks, including cloud
management. Clearly, there is room for growth with these statistics, and, over
the next few years, I think we will see an increase in the prevalence of
autonomic expert systems.
No comments:
Post a Comment