No, not colonial as in Battlestar
Gallactica or the British Empire, colonial as in corals and weeds and virtual
machines
I was out pulling weeds this summer
– Canada thistle to be exact – and was struck by how much its root system
reminded me of Cnidaria (soft corals to those of you whose experience with
aquaria remains relegated to suicidal goldfish). Canada thistle is difficult
to control because of its extensive root system. Pulling a larger specimen you
often find yourself pulling up its root, only to find it connected to three,
four or more other specimens. Cnidaria reproduce in a similar fashion, sharing
a “root” system that enables them to share resources. Unlike thistles, however,
Cnidaria has several different growth forms. There’s a traditional colonial
form that resembles thistles – a single, shared long root with various
specimens popping up along the path – and one that may be familiar to folks
who’ve seen Finding Nemo: a tree formation in which the root branches
not only horizontally but vertically, with individual specimens forming upwards
along the branch in what gives it a tree-like appearance.
Cnidaria produce a variety of colonial forms, each of which
is one organism but consists of polyp-like zooids. The simplest is a connecting
tunnel that runs over the substrate (rock or seabed) and from which single
zooids sprout. In some cases the tunnels form visible webs, and in others they
are enclosed in a fleshy mat. More complex forms are also based on connecting
tunnels but produce "tree-like" groups of zooids. The
"trees" may be formed either by a central zooid that functions as a
"trunk" with later zooids growing to the sides as
"branches", or in a zig-zag shape as a succession of zooids, each of
which grows to full size and then produces a single bud at an angle to itself.
In many cases the connecting tunnels and the "stems" are covered in
periderm, a protective layer of chitin.[6]
Some colonial forms have other specialized types of zooid, for example, to pump
water through their tunnels.[12]
Of course, both thistle and Cnidaria
and the notion of colonial inter-dependence is one that’s shared by the data
center.
Virtual machines deployed on the
same physical host replicate in many ways the advantages and disadvantages of a
Cnidarian tree-formation. The close proximity of the 15.6 average VMs per host
(according to Vkernel VMI 2012) allows them to share the “local” (virtual) network, which
eliminates many of the physical sources of network latency that occur naturally
in the data center. But it also means that a failure in the physical network
connecting them to the network backbone is catastrophic for all VMs on a given
host. Which is why you want to pay careful attention to placement of VMs in a dynamic data center.
The concept of pulling compute
resources from anywhere in the data center to support scalability on-demand is
a tantalizing one, but doing so can have disastrous results in the event of a
catastrophic failure in the network. Architecture and careful planning is necessary
to ensure that resources do not end up grouped in such a way that a failure in
one negatively impacts the entire application. Proximity must be considered as
part of a fault isolation strategy, which is a requirement when resources are
loosely – if at all – coupled to specific locations within the data center.
No comments:
Post a Comment