- Steven
Leidig, manager of enclosure engineering at Crenlo (www.crenlo.com/enclosures), says:
In
Part 1 of this post, I discussed how there is often a disconnect
between the procurement agent and data center designer. This point is
demonstrated by the lack of information often presented to enclosure and rack
manufacturers when the purchasing agent places an order. This lack of
information often leads to project delays and/or increases in long-term cost of
operation due to inefficient design. Thus, I suggest the purchasing agent be
able to answer the following seven questions prior to procuring racks for the
data center.
1. What
is the total weight of equipment being loaded into the enclosure?
Although
this information may seem trivial, nearly every design choice of an enclosure
is dependent upon weight load capacity, making it one of the most critical
pieces of information to provide to the manufacturer. Despite its importance,
it’s information that is rarely provided by the buyer.
What buyers often fail to
realize is that selection of nearly every component of an enclosure should be
based on weight, including casters,
levelers, shelves, drawers, sliders, frames, tie-down
hardware and anti-tip bases. Often, we don’t feel
comfortable recommending a solution until we have the weight load information,
because recommending something with insufficient capacity could pose safety
concerns and ultimately result in equipment damage. See Figure 2.
2. In
what kind of environment will the equipment be installed?
The
reliability, performance and efficiency of network equipment are highly
dependent upon the equipment’s level of protection against harmful
environmental factors. With today’s network equipment no longer limited to
phone closets, new environments are posing new protection challenges.
The operating environment
heavily influences recommendations on components such as vents, filters and
gaskets, as well as the type of materials used and finishes applied to the
exterior of an enclosure. What might be right for an A/C room probably wouldn’t
be right for a factory floor. As electronics are being put into these new,
harsher environments, protection against factors such as water, dust, corrosive
agents and emitted radiation are all becoming increasingly common requests.
Failure to base enclosure
design on the operating environment can result in decreased lifespan of the
equipment. As an example, I’ve seen
enclosures installed in industrial environments, where the fans are sucking in
dust and debris, circulating it through the equipment and leading to premature
failure. With the addition of a filter
at the air intake, they could have avoided this problem. This is a simple
example, but one that demonstrates the importance of discussing the operating
environment with the enclosure manufacturer.
3. What, if any, industry
regulations must be met?
In addition to posing new
equipment protection concerns, new environments bring new regulatory
requirements. Many industries have specific design, manufacturing and
installation processes that must be implemented in order to meet these
regulations.
Increasingly, enclosure
manufacturers must act as regulatory compliance consultants for buyers. I’ve
seen situations where our customers have first-rate electrical engineers, but
when it comes to meeting the architectural building seismic requirements
outlined by the International Building Code, they’re out of their element.
Industry regulations are most
commonly in place to ensure there are standards of equipment protection based
on environment. For instance, the International
Building Code sets forth standards for how enclosures must be
installed in areas with seismic concern. The National Electrical Manufacturers
Association (NEMA) sets ratings for protection against environmental factors,
such as water and dust. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has set
forth guidelines for shielding of radio frequency interference, and the
military has a wide array of standards that apply to specific installation
scenarios, such as protection against shock and vibration on naval ships.
Meeting these regulations is
often a legal necessity for customers; however, it’s not uncommon for there to
be a gap in communication between the buyer and the installer, leading to
project delays and increased costs.
On multiple occasions, we’ve
had procurement agents or systems integrators purchase enclosures without
informing us of the necessity for regulatory compliance. When they get the
product, and the installer or building engineer sees it’s not stamped with the
necessary code, they are not allowed to install the enclosure. At that point,
they have to ship it back, and we start over again, which delays the project
and drives up costs. This further demonstrates the necessity of good
communication between the person procuring the equipment, the installer and the
designer.
Stay
tuned for Part 3 of this three-part series from Steven Leidig, manager of
enclosure engineering at Crenlo.

No comments:
Post a Comment